Big Bang Theory: Yes or No ... please

thepenguin · Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:42 am Post subject:

i believe in the big bang until science can present a better explanation, or until we have proof of a big bang, but i refuse to believe in creation. i am positive that that cannot, and will not, be proven...

LeanOnMe · Member Age: 21 Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 22

My opinion: I keep an open mind since anything is possible, I don't shun the possibility of one 'God'/many gods/the big bang theory/Darwinism...
As an athiest I see things from a logical stand-point. We're here on Earth right now, we're alive and we should live life to the fullest instead of worrying about our destinations after life. The ten commandments are a form of control meant for a savage group of ancients seeking guidance in their time of need. We've evolved since then and now the commandments are (or at least should be) just plain common sense.

alx · Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:30 pm Post subject:

Both the creation and the big bang theory have exactly the same amout of profe, so picking the one that offers eternal life over nothingnes is the logical way to go.

LeanOnMe · Member Age: 21 Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 22

But life is so long already, I'd rather drift off into Oblivion, neither is 'logical' it's a matter of preference.

alx · Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:39 pm Post subject:

Life isn't long.
And if your talking about the chrisian version of the creation story then I prefer Oblivion to.

But with the cult of nannal there is no hell so I'm fine with creation storys, my religion judjes us in life.

LeanOnMe · Member Age: 21 Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 22

To each his own opinion. Very Happy

alx · Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:47 pm Post subject:

How true.
I hate the way this forum sensers the word h£ll.

Also anyone interested in the cult of nannal give us a PM.

XB · Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:47 am Post subject:

Yes, I believe in the Big Bang theory. I think it's more of a proven fact now.

alx · Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:07 pm Post subject:

The big bang theory isnt proved at all, far from it.

Thats why its a theory not a fact.

XB · Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:51 pm Post subject:

So, would you still say the same about the Evolution theory, that it's not a fact yet?

alx · Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:06 pm Post subject:

No, Evolution has substantional profe the big bang theory hasn't.

XB · Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject:

alx · Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 7:23 pm Post subject:

The same reason Pythagoras’s thearum is called a theory.

XB · Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:58 am Post subject:

OK, so the Big Bang theory is just a theory because it is, and the Evolution theory is a fact because it is. Can I see an explanation of that statement? Or is it double standards?

alx · Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:32 am Post subject:

Evolution theory = fossilized remains

Big bang theory = speculation

Being as you are defending it maby you should back it up with something.

And Pythagoras’s thearum is called a threory because wile it is possible (although unlightly) that some one could prove it worng, it has been called a theory for so long and is considered fact so widely that the tital theory is just so they don't have to change the text books.

Come on lover boy find me some big bang proof.